Columbia Academic Freedom logo.jpg

Petition



About all of us have elected to study economic science so as to get a deep apprehension of the economical phenomena with which the citizens of nowadays are faced up. But the education that is provided, that's to say for the most part neoclassic theory or approaches calculated from it, do not broadly answer this anticipation. So, even when the hypothesis lawfully comes off itself from eventualities in the first example, it seldom carries out the essential return to the realities. The empiric side (diachronic facts, activity of institutions , study of the demeanors and schemes of the agents . . . ) is nearly nonexistent. Moreover, this breach in the teaching, this discount for concrete facts, poses an tremendous issue for those who would like to deliver themselves utile to economic and social doers.

The instrumental apply of maths appears essential. But resort to numerical formalisation when it is not an tool but kind of an end in itself, directs to a true dementia praecox in regard to the real life. Formalization makes it comfortable to build exercises and to control models whose implication is restrictive to finding "the beneficial result" (that's, the logical consequence following from the initial speculations) so to be capable to write "a beneficial paper". This tradition, under the pretense of being scientific, alleviates assessment and selection, but never answers to the issue that we're posing concerning contemporary economic disputations.